BBC2
The Railway: Keeping Britain on Track
3. Standing Room Only
The third programme in this 6 part series focusses on Paddington , Reading station and the Great Western mainline.
The pre Christmas rush obviously brings added pressures to the staff to keep the services running, and keeping the travelling public happy....not easy, given the responses of some of the
passengers...
Its always a lot easier being the back seat driver, so the equanimity of the railway staff is to be admired, when it becomes apparent that some of the travelling public think that they are somehow not deserving of common decency and respect...
One elderly gentleman, though, who had survived a serious mugging attack 15 years ago , and was now dependent on the assistance of Great Western staff to get to his train, was full of praise for them..he said that they deserved praise not derision.
Indeed, in an earlier scene, one frustrated passenger sarcastically asks."But will it (the next train due) be on time?"
And one frustrated passenger, squeezed into the last space on the rain, wonders whether such loading is legal.
On the track, we become familiar with the work of emergency response teams...whether it be to remove a dead animal from the track, or repair signalling cable damaged by a passing train..
..or to remove a body from a foot crossing....
The challenge of major work at Reading station, the demolition of an old bridge at Cow Lane and installation of its replacement was particularly challenging, since the contractors had just 72 hours to complete the work. And the director of the works was on hand to do a PR job with the watching local residents....
And then, when the staion got going again after the enforced break, along comes the British weather..and fare increases..to rub salt into the wound...
It doesn't get any easier....but this programme gives an insight into the attitude of the travelling public and railway staff..and from that perspective is quite revealing...and sadly so. For the one group seems not to appreciate the bigger picture, and the other group would like to be appreciated just a little bit more.....
This episode can be watched on BBC iPlayer.
Keeping Britain on Track...programme website
International Railway Journal
THE British parliament's Public Accounts Committee has published a scathing report on last year's cancellation of West Coast franchise by the Department for Transport (DfT).
THE European Union (EU) will allocate Lats 400m ($US 752m) towards a programme to electrify Latvia's railway network, according to a statement issued by the Latvian Ministry of Transport. The Ministry says that the work is scheduled to begin by the end of this year and will last up to 2020.
ETIHAD Rail, the developer and future operator of the United Arab Emirates' railway network, has secured a $US 1.28bn loan to finance Stage One of its inaugural project to build the 264km dedicated freight route from Shah and Habshan to Ruwais.
www.progressiverailroading.com US News
FRA releases new study on rail worker fatigue
Denver RTD to review unsolicited contractor proposal for North Metro line
NS closes hump yard in Virginia, eliminates 140 jobs
Operation Lifesaver, FTA announce transit-rail safety education grants
APTA launches 'Early Career' program to develop future transit leaders
Progressive Rail to serve new Minnesota grain facility; Union Pacific to serve new Texas rail park
Sen. Franken calls on Obama to address freight-rail competition; AAR says rail shippers already protected by federal laws
League of Railway Industry Women affiliates with CMA to offer seminar at Railway Interchange 2013
www.railway-technology.com Updates
Long-distance passenger rail traffic in Europe to increase 21% by 2020 Long-distance rail passenger traffic in Europe is expected to increase by 21% to 1.36 billion passengers by 2020, according to a new report by Amadeus.
Titagarh Wagons and FreightCar America to dissolve Indian joint venture
Titagarh Wagons (TWL) and FreightCar America (FCA) have agreed to dissolve their Indian joint venture (JV) company, Titagarh FreightCar.
Transmashholding signs EP20 locomotive maintenance deal with Russian Railways
Transmashholding (TMH) has signed an agreement with Russian Railways (RZD) to provide maintenance for RZD's EP20 dual-voltage electric passenger locomotives.
New Orleans to use GE Optimization Solutions to manage rail operations
New Orleans Public Belt Railroad (NOPB) in Louisiana, US, has signed a deal with GE Transportation to use its software to manage railroad transportation, railcar repair and maintenance.
Plus news at.....
Shedmaster Railway News
railwaygazette.com reports on the Bordeaux tram-train project, funding for the Monterrey Metro Line 3 ..and news that HS1 has notched up 25 million passenger journeys since 2009.
World Heritage & Railway News
News from the Gloucester Warwicks Railway, East Coast's dedicated Skyfall train......
Railway Engineering News
railwaygazette.com - FRANCE: Transport Minister Frédéric Cuvillier joined RFF President Jacques Rapoport and other dignitaries on February 25 to mark the completion of the second bore of the 4 020 m Saverne Tunnel,
UK Office of Rail Regulation (ORR)
Network Rail fined £100,000 for causing serious injury of track worker in Cheshunt, Hertfordshire
26 February 2013
ORR/5/13
Network Rail has today been fined £100,000 and ordered to pay costs of £25,000 following a prosecution brought by the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) for breaches of health and safety law which resulted in the serious injury of a Network Rail track maintenance worker in March 2010.
On the morning of 30 March 2010, Terence Wray, a maintenance worker, was repairing a fault on the track at Cheshunt Junction in Hertfordshire. In order to let an approaching train pass, Mr Wray moved to what he believed was a position of safety on the track. However the train diverted to the line on which Mr Wray was sheltered and struck him, causing serious injuries.
Today’s sentencing at St Albans Crown Court follows an extensive ORR investigation into the incident which found the work at Cheshunt Junction had not been properly managed or taken into account the safety of those working at the site. The court heard evidence that the work was inadequately planned by unqualified personnel and, despite safer methods being available, was scheduled to be carried out whilst trains continued to run, placing the track maintenance workers in unnecessary danger. Network Rail pleaded guilty to charges brought in connection with the incident at Hertford Magistrates’ Court on 13 November 2012.
Commenting on the case, Tom Wake, ORR’s Deputy Director Railway Safety, said:
“The safety of track workers, and all those working on Britain’s railways, is a top priority for ORR. Where maintenance work takes place it should be planned, well managed and not place workers in unnecessary danger.
“In this case, Network Rail’s management and planning for maintenance of the track at Cheshunt Junction, Hertfordshire was not good enough. The company’s failures caused the entirely avoidable and life-changing injuries for its employee Terence Wray.
“Since the incident Network Rail has reduced the number of works taking place on tracks whilst trains continued to run, further protecting the safety of its employees. The regulator will continue to monitor the company’s management of rail maintenance and we will always step in when required to protect those working on, and using, the railway.”
Review of the General Approval (Stations) 2010 and General Approval (Depots) 2010
Reference: ORR/004/2013
Date published: 26 February 2013
Start date: 26 February 2013
Closing date: by 17:00 on 23 April 2013
The General Approval (Stations) and General Approval (Depots) 2010 have been in force for over two years. To ensure the policies remain fit for purpose, we are writing to access parties – those with day to day use of the General Approvals – to seek their views on some changes we propose and to invite them to tell us of any changes they would like to suggest.
The letter sets out:
- the background of the General Approvals
- findings from our monthly audits of the use of the General Approvals
- the scope of the review itself
- next steps
Consultation letter
How to respond
Please send your responses in electronic (or if not possible, in hard-copy format) by 17:00 on 23 April 2013 to:
Stuart Freer
Stations and Depots & Network Code Executive
Office of Rail Regulation
One Kemble Street
London
WC2B 4AN
Please note:
So that we are able to apply web standards to content on our website, we would prefer that you email us your response in Microsoft Word format.
If you do send us a PDF document, please:
- create it from the electronic Word file (preferably using Adobe Acrobat), as opposed to an image scan, where possible; and
- ensure that the PDF's security method is set to no security in the document properties.
Last updated: Februray 2013.
Christian Wolmar -
Rail 715: HS2 is still a big Y
Now it gets serious. The publication of the northern sections of HS2 provide, at last, a real insight into the extent of the scheme and the difficulties it faces.
It is interesting how the emphasis of the scheme has changed. When HS2 was initially put forward, the focus was on its green credentials, the strong business case and the faster journey times. Now the watchword is regeneration and bridging the North South divide. As I have written before, I would so love to throw myself into wholehearted support for this concept, as most of my fellow writers in this magazine do, but every time we get more detail about the project, my scepticism, born of my training at university in economics, simply increases. Moreover, the questions mount up but, as is the modern way, there was no press conference or briefing to mark the publication of the latest command paper, merely a 7am – was it really market sensitive or would a 00 01 launch have given us all too much time to formulate questions – launch on the website. It is amazing how new technology has made politicians less accountable, but that’s another story.
So I apologise for being the party pooper. Let’s look first at two key aspects, the price tag and the argument about the effect on regional differences. The total cost for the two sections is now in the region of £33bn which is the figure that was set out as an estimate when the scheme was first announced by Andrew Adonis, the last transport secretary in the Labour government. While obviously there has been some broad brush work on it, and the figure has risen somewhat, it still remains a very tentative figure. For example, we now learn, for instance, that the stations in Manchester and Leeds will be located centrally, which is the right decision in terms of the benefits of the project, rather than parkway stations on the edge of town. However, having central stations result in enormous extra cost, as the Victorians found out which explains why they built so many stations on the outskirts. I cannot believe, for example, that the price of a 7.5 mile tunnel under Manchester, which is now needed, does not increase the proposed cost by more than the £400m which has been added since the initial costings of the second section of HS2. Moreover, as the report says, there will be further costs when mitigating measures are taken to avoid environmental damage.
Therefore, the total cost remains an estimate and yet that is the basis for the business case
which, according to the report, will deliver £2 of benefit for every £1 spent. I have rehearsed my doubts about this methodology all too often, and will not repeat them, but suffice to say that such a ratio is very tenuous indeed for a scheme of this magnitude especially as the ‘benefits’ are so intangible, and still based largely on time savings which are pretty illusory since either people are travelling for leisure or they are business people who can now work on trains – indeed, I have produced many of these columns sitting with my baby laptop in the peace and quiet of a speeding train.
The regional argument was clearly debunked on the BBC Today Programme on the day of the announcement, Monday 28
th by Professor John Tomaney, who has studied the effect of high speed lines around the world. Despite the fact that regeneration had been used widely to justify the construction of high speed lines, his conclusion was stark: ‘There is very little evidence that building a high speed line heals north south divides as the Deputy Prime Minister was saying. On the contrary, the evidence suggests that it is the capital cities which gain principally from these developments’. So good for London, not so good for the rest of the country. He added that he was agnostic on the project, and that he was merely seeking to point out that the railway’s supposed benefits will not necessarily be achieved.
OK, so what does that leave the scheme’s supporters? In his introduction, Patrick McLoughlin, the Transport Secretary said that for decades we had watched other countries improve their transport networks ‘while ours has been overstretched and overburdened’. Well yes, but surely it would have been better to define the problem first rather than just throwing money at a prestigious scheme. It is the lack of hard evidence that dogs this whole scheme. The idea that the West Coast is the most overcrowded line in the country is just plain daft. To relieve overcrowding, it would be much better to invest the money in several other rail lines, such as services out of Waterloo and Paddington, and the Brighton line. Yet nothing is planned for these, except the much welcome electrification of the Great Western.
Indeed the West Coast is simply not ‘full’ and with the recent addition of two coaches to most of the Pendolino train sets, the increase in capacity will deal with expected growth. But just how much will it grow in the next few years. That is a crucial issue. In his recent Railways Studies Association lecture, Chris Stokes, who used to be chief executive of the Strategic Rail Authority pointed out that the growth of long distance rail travel has slowed dramatically. While, as a result of the Department’s crazy rules relating to ‘commercial confidentiality’ figures on West Coast are not openly available, figures that have emerged suggest that the boost from the line upgrade and the introduction of Pendolinos is now tailing off. According to Stagecoach’s figures, growth was in passenger miles was only 4.6 per cent last year, compared with 20 per cent in 2009/10 which suggests the Pendolino effect is tailing off.
Therefore, this railway is being built on a hunch. It is being put forward in an era of rapidly changing technologies whose effect can only be guessed at. The uncertainties over oil and energy prices have never been greater. And it is presented as the only game in town when there are so many alternatives – some much less palatable such as road schemes – on which this money could be spent. If I had £33bn to spend – or £2bn per year to put it more precisely – I would spend it in a much more mundane way to build the 25 tram schemes that John Prescott promised in the ten year transport programme published in 2000 (we got one) and that would help us catch up with our foreign rivals who have embraced tram schemes in their urban areas.
My alternative for the railways would be to muddle through. That’s what the railway has always been best at. The last issue of
Rail showed that the incremental way in which railways in the capital such as the Docklands Light Railway and the London Overground has actually been very successful. I would prefer to see a programme of continuous improvement across the whole railway rather than this focus on one line which will undoubtedly have a detrimental effect on rail services to cities it does not serve.
I may of course be utterly wrong. The trains thundering up the new line in 2033 will be full and cheap, creating wealth at both ends and delivering reductions in carbon, and the project will be perceived as a triumph akin to the construction of the original London & Birmingham and Grand Junction railways. But if I am not pushing up daisies by then, I will take a bet on it that my scepticism is justified.
Border Agency madness creates train mayhem
This summer Eurostar is expanding its services to southern France by running trains direct to Lyon and Aix en Provence, as well as Avignon which has been regularly served by the company for some years. However, the British authorities have conspired to deter passengers from using the trains by insisting that while the outward leg can be undertaken normally, on the return passengers will have to exit at Lille to be checked through Border Agency controls. That’s because the Agency does not want to staff the other stations, or the trains, and therefore has insisted on these controls because it is worried that illegal immigrants will otherwise get in.
Madness does not begin to describe the ridiculous nature of this requirement. It is a clear discrimination against railways. It certainly would not happen on planes or ferries!
Already I have had arguments with Border Agency officials at St Pancras who demand, with no proper authority, to see your ticket when coming back from Brussels because, they say, of some door that is left open at the Gare du Midi. Lord Berkeley, the chairman of the Railfreight Group, has in fact questioned their authority to do this and found there is none.
In fact, this is relevant to the HS2 debate. One of the justifications for HS2 will be that it will enable people to travel to Europe more easily. Not, though, clearly until this sort of madness is sorted out.
All this is partly Eurostar’s fault. I have always been critical of the fact that the company never really gets its teeth into issues that effect its passengers. It has allowed, for example, a very complex arrangement for people arriving at St Pancras to leave the trains, rather than just being able to walk.
INVITATION
LAUNCH OF THE PLATFORM
FOR THE ELECTRIFICATION OF SURFACE TRANSPORT
Our newly-formed Platform is organising a panel discussion on the electrification of transport onTuesday, 19 March 2013, from 18:30 to 20:30
at Hotel Renaissance
Rue du Parnasse 19 - 1050 BrusselsA reception will be held on the premises immediately after the event for further discussions and networking.
If you wish to attend, please register online not later than 14 March.The Platform for the Electrification of Surface Transport brings together eleven organisations from across industries and transport modes. It is committed to the promotion of further electrification of surface transport on a cooperative and multi-modal basis.
The agenda of the event is attached, together with the common vision of the Platform, including a list of its current members.
Should you have any question, please send an e-mail to events@cer.be.
_________________________________________________________
PDF 118 Kb)
